> On Apr 29, 2025, at 6:08 PM, Dave Crocker <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 4/29/2025 1:33 AM, John Levine wrote: >> I don't expect MUAs like Outlook or Thunderbird (or for us old guys Alpine) >> to support DKIM2 either, for >> ths same reason. They submit new mail to their MSA and it takes care of >> DKIM2 signing. You know, just >> like it takes care of DKIM signing now. > > > There is a difference between implementation choices and a design that > constrains those choices. > > DKIM can be, and has been implemented, in originating and receiving MUAs. > Works fine. There is, of course, nothing wrong with choosing to implement in > by platform operators, but the DKIM architecture very carefully does not > require this. > > There seems to be a continuing need for people to be more diligently > indoctrinated into the perspective represented by the End to End Arguments.
DKIM was a protocol that addressed the problems and challenges of sending mail in the mid 00’s. The problems and challenges we’re facing nearly 2 decades later are different and need different solutions. We also know a lot more than we did then. What we need is something that addresses the issues we’re facing today. Laura _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
