On Wed 07/May/2025 00:18:41 +0200 Wei Chuang wrote:
forwarders will likely also want a say in what happens to a message that fails validation.
In order to keep it simple, I'd conceive the author domain, the one in From:, to be the "owner" of the message.
we propose that the forwarder domain be able to publish a policy that specifies the forwarder's intent on what enforcement to apply.
This sounds to me like an affected complication. When authentication works well, there will be no reason to specify weal policies. Until then, let the owner decide.
This also calls for DMARC reporting to be generated for forwarders.
One can ask for feedback even without trying to override the policy.
By default the "rua=" and "ruf=" tags specify where the forwarder reports may go. However forwarders may specify a different location "frua=" and "fruf=" to distinguish forwarding traffic from origination traffic in the reports.
Rather than a different reporting address, I'd specify additional report attributes that identify unambiguously which forwarding chain the messages belong to.
Best Ale -- _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
