On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 10:21 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> wrote:
> A piece of feedback about this, now that I've done a first shot at the > minutes from the last interim: > > On Fri, May 8, 2026 at 1:09 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> * draft-chuang-dkim2-dns will get a Call For Adoption as discussed. >> > > Is there actually enough to say here that a separate document is warranted? > The theory here is that the DNS record specification is mostly copied verbatim from RFC6376 with a few updates for DKIM2 that make it unsuitable for just normatively referencing RFC6376. Yet, the DNS record specification will be more stable than the draft-ietf-dkim-dkim2-spec part of the DKIM2 specification; hence, it should be separate. That said, I'm okay with merging them if that's what the WG wants. -Wei
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
