It appears that Wei Chuang <[email protected]> said: >The theory here is that the DNS record specification is mostly copied >verbatim from RFC6376 with a few updates for DKIM2 that make it unsuitable >for just normatively referencing RFC6376. Yet, the DNS record >specification will be more stable than the draft-ietf-dkim-dkim2-spec part >of the DKIM2 specification; hence, it should be separate. That said, I'm >okay with merging them if that's what the WG wants.
I think it makes sense to keep it separate for now. When we're closer to done, we can consider if there's enough here to be worth keeping it separate. R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
