It appears that Bron Gondwana <[email protected]> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >I agree with your second point without conceding the first. We were >experimenting with different possibilities in a collaborative development >stage. This wasn't supposed to be a fixed final spec, >ready to be "implemented correctly". The development stage is different from >coming along and implementing a static spec later. > >And I don't think this line of discussion is leading anywhere productive. I >continue to hold that the characterisation of that hackathon in your draft is >unfair.
I agree with Bron. The whole point of the Hackathon is for people to implement draft specs to find out what works and what doesn't, and to find and if time permits fix gaps and mistakes in the drafts. Nobody expects the drafts to be perfect, or for implementations based on them to work on the first try. R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
