It appears that Wei Chuang <[email protected]> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >What about keeping the DKIM2 exclusion of X- header fields, and >standardizing a new prefix for proprietary headers that can be optionally >protected?
The current plan is to sign everything except X-* and a short list of trace headers. So if you add: Google-secret-sauce: 42swordfish that'll get signed. I don't see a problem here to be solved. R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
