-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In message <[email protected]>, Alexander
Stumpf <[email protected]> writes
>How about including the PQC public key as another info in the header and only
>store its SHA3 in a TXT record? SHA3 is, as of now, quantum-safe.
that makes PQ handling very different from other algorithms, not
impossible but rather messy for the code to handle
of course we could do all algorithms that way, but it would mean that
everyone had to change what was recorded in the DNS in order to use
DKIM2. That is not a sensible route to consider ...
... so let us pose the question as to what is to be recommended to us on
the basis that key handling will be essentially the same. If the answer
is that we have asked for the impossible only then should we consider
what type of engineering we should live with
- --
richard @ highwayman . com "Nothing seems the same
Still you never see the change from day to day
And no-one notices the customs slip away"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1
iQA/AwUBaje9zWHfC/FfW545EQI9hgCeMAr0vZXHQFjZ5w5of4AOhe7QAIAAoKE5
9ZSYb1O9c2aA0+AG+4DessqX
=zacI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
