It appears that Alexander Stumpf <[email protected]> said: >Hi, > >How about including the PQC public key as another info in the header and only >store its SHA3 in a TXT record? SHA3 is, as of now, quantum-safe.
Yes, that's one of the things I suggested,. >> IIM put both the key and the signature in the message, with a hash of the >> key in >> the DNS record. Would that still work for a PQ scheme? I gather Cisco had a >> patent on that but I belive it's expired or will expire shortly. R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
