-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [answering this one topic at a time, mainly with a view to explaining where text in spec-04 has come from]
In message <[email protected]>, Hannah Stern <[email protected]> writes >> #3 Add the experimental Delivered-To: header field as an exception to >> signing. Also the exceptions are now in a section of their own rather >> than being buried away. > >Stylistically, a simple list of ignored fields would be helpful instead >of digging the list out of prose. fair enough -- I added a summary section >> #4 Added "feedhere" flag so that privacy preserving forwarders can deal >> with feedback reports (recall -- which are not defined here) do not >> reveal where email was forwarded. > >There's not even a mechanism to give a target for feedback reports (even >with not-yet-specified content format). the expectation is there will be some text about this in the Best Practice document. At present feedback arrangements are highly proprietary (and far from universal) ... the aim was to put enough scaffolding into the spec to support existing DKIM1 based schemes. If there was appetite for some standardisation then that scaffolding could be refined. - -- richard @ highwayman . com "Nothing seems the same Still you never see the change from day to day And no-one notices the customs slip away" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 iQA/AwUBakp0aWHfC/FfW545EQIeBwCaAnJvQxjMxel/QUzcfO2mS+/h5YgAoM20 2sJULyMYDmUblPoU5MqMeyEd =osHB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
