It appears that Edmund Lodewijks <[email protected]> said: >Of course, a signature sitting below a recipe-less change becomes >unverifiable. The result is, I suppose, a more targeted fail where the >chain can no longer be verified, rather than a blanket PERMERROR.
The DKIM2 signature header has the hash of all of the previous DKIM2-Signature and Message-Instance headers. Why couldn't you verify that? R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
