On 5 Jul 2026, at 10:15, Richard Clayton wrote:
The text was meant to put across to implementers "don't add
unnecessary
Message-Instance fields it just wastes time and energy"... but it
isn't
an interop issue so MUST NOT was rejected in favour of SHOULD NOT and
the MUST in #9.1.3 probably needs rephrasing.
I'd point out that 2119 says that if it's not an interoperability issue,
SHOULD NOT is also inappropriate. I would re-word to something along the
lines of of your first sentence: "It is unnecessary to do this and just
wastes time and energy."
pr
--
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
