On Mon, Sep 7, 2026, at 20:00, Timo Gerke wrote: > It looks like Bron Gondwana aimed to say: > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2026, at 06:23, Timo Gerke wrote: > >> - Serialization Layer: Relying on third-party parser heuristics > >> to secure a highly exposed, high-volume wire interface remains > >> a structural vulnerability. In high-performance/high- > >> reliability (HP/HR) environments—utilizing architectures like > >> the latest IBM Telum processors—unregulated JSON parsing under > >> volumetric load risks blocking complete cores and breaking > >> line-rate streaming. > > > > You keep stating this like it's a fact, despite having never > > addressed my response "there are people who run planet-scale > > email systems in this discussion, and they are not concerned > > about this". > > > > Yes, I know Fastmail is a worldwide mail provider. But powergrid > management is quite different, especially for VNB (DSOs) and TNB > (TSOs) within the Continental European Synchronous Area, the US > NERC CIP framework, or under Australia's own SOCI Act. You should > have a look at the AEMO regulations.
Who is proposing using DKIM2 for power grid management? > At critical infrastructure edge gateways handling synchronized > grid stability, "it's bounded" is an unacceptable parsing metric > that introduces predictable resource exhaustion paths. To sustain > deterministic line-rate validation under volumetric load, the > wire footprint must mandate static, hardware-verifiable syntax > limits. Again, what does this have to do with SMTP? Bron. -- Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd / Fastmail US LLC [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
