-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In message <[email protected]>, Bron
Gondwana <[email protected]> writes
>Who is proposing using DKIM2 for power grid management?
according to an AI near me, no-one at all (let's move on)
- -=-=-=-=-
Core Comparison of Protocols in Grid Operations
* Data Type
** Frequency / Urgency
*** Typical Protocols
**** Network Layer
* Telemetry & Control (Frequency, Volts, SCADA)
** Real-time (seconds)
*** ICCP (TASE.2), IEC 104, IEC 61850
**** Process Control Network (Isolated)
* Market & Scheduling (Bids, Schedules, Flexibilities)
** Day-ahead / Intra-day
*** IEC 62325 (MADES), Web Services (REST/SOAP)
**** DMZ / Business Network
* Reporting & Alerts (Mainframe Logs, Invoicing)
** Asynchronous / Batch
*** SMTP, SFTP, AS4
**** Office Network (Internet-Facing)
- -=-=-=-=-
>> At critical infrastructure edge gateways handling synchronized
>> grid stability, "it's bounded" is an unacceptable parsing metric
>> that introduces predictable resource exhaustion paths.
yup... don't add DKIM2 to IEC 104
- --
richard @ highwayman . com "Nothing seems the same
Still you never see the change from day to day
And no-one notices the customs slip away"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1
iQA/AwUBap6ZKGHfC/FfW545EQIdGACg6aVqgMocwHD3NJAzkk5gVKjJZNwAoKa5
mrD1k2bAG/p7JkUsKjAnd6ia
=RH9n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
