On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:33:11 -0400, Keith Moore wrote: > It shouldn't be an either-or choice. The author should be able to sign the > message indicating that he wrote the content (so that a recipient can verify > that yes, it really was written by who it says), and the list should be able > to sign the message to indicate that the message was forwarded via the list > (so that a recipient can verify that yes, the message really did come from > the list).
This describes two different semantics for a DKIM signature. Where does the current DKIM specification provide for such distinction in the semantics, so that it can be reliably and accurately interpreted by a verifying agent? d/ --- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking +1.408.246.8253 dcrocker a t ... WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
