On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Ned Freed wrote: > > The real question is how this affects the threat analysis. I think SSP > needs to be part of the analysis, but we need to be clear when we're > talking about base DKIM and when we're talking about SSP. That way we > know which benefits (and risks) accrue from what.
At the moment in my outline I have put SSP in a sub-section which will discuss the relationship between the new "signer" identity and the standard 2822 origin identities. http://www.cus.cam.ac.uk/~fanf2/hermes/doc/antiforgery/draft-fanf-dkim-rationale.txt Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dotat.at/ BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR GOOD. _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
