On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:39:41 -0700, Michael Thomas wrote: > Who knows? I mean, if mail eventually needs to be > signed before it's accepted by the masses, they may > well be forced to sign -- or find some other transport > vehicle.
I think that the history of adoption of SPF by spammers demonstrates nicely that the mere act of associating a confirmable identity is not enough. So the mere act of signing should not be a criterion for acceptance of the mail. The required additional step is some basis for assessing that identity. d/ --- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking +1.408.246.8253 dcrocker a t ... WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
