On 01/04/2006 14:20, Douglas Otis wrote: I really hate it that we are debating SPF on the DKIM list, but it seems unavoidable...
> SPF and SSP will have similar problems. With SPF, you have pointed > out the RFC1123 5.3.6(a) issue that may cause those concerned with > the resulting disappearance of messages to use the '?' qualifier, > which is fairly common. This is completely contrary to my experience. Because I use shared MTAs, almost all e-mails I send have an SPF NEUTRAL (?) result. In about a year and a half of doing this, I've had exactly 3 e-mail messages rejected (not disappeared by the way) and they were all the result of configuration errors on the distant end (2 of the 3 thanked me for pointing out their error). As far as I know, I've had NONE disappear. So, even if you start out with the premise the SSP is like SPF (I don't think that's right either), nothing that follows in the original e-mail is correct. Scott K _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
