> Well, OK. if a message has both a signature from the From: domain and > one from someone else, does that pass? Why or why not?
----- From: Hector Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For the EXCLUSIVE policy? Following SSP, it would be a REJECT because the policy says no 3PS should exist. If it does, then it should be given the evil eye. ... I understand what you are saying, but it is what it is. That is what the DKIM/SSP drafts defines. It is already "solved" per se. ----- From: Michael Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I've always interpreted this as it should pass. What would be the reason that it shouldn't? That the other signature gave it cooties? ----- >> I'm increasingly getting the impression that we don't really understand >> the semantics of SSP. R's, John _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
