Dave Crocker wrote:
or the response. So just implementing
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/specs/draft-allman-dkim-base-00-10dc.txt
without SSP is considered a valid DKIM implementation?
> Thanks for the response. So just implementing
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/specs/draft-allman-dkim-base-00-10dc.txt
> without SSP is considered a valid DKIM implementation?
As I recall, people have had some debate about this exact point.
I believe, quite strongly, that implementing the core signature
mechanism definitely qualifies as implementing DKIM.
Frankly, the IETF isn't the police so this is a pretty moot point. But
if you're interested
in truth-in-advertising, making explicit that you abide by -base and/or
-ssp would
at least give an interested person the tools to make a better informed
decision.
Mike
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org
