On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 08:37:37PM +0000, Stephen Farrell allegedly wrote: > If you choose to write code based on an Internet-Draft you are > taking a risk that the specification changes before it becomes > a standard.
It's probably not the intent, but this could be read as discouraging such activity. On the encouragement side, it's worth stating the obvious that implementing I-Ds is probably one of the best ways to find problems, oversights and other glitches that are not obvious in the abstract. Also, from a "marketing" perspective, the question we used to get in the early days of DK was "who else?". One expects the same with DKIM. Pointing to players that are investing the effort and producing product, albeit with the risk of change, strikes me as more positive than negative. In any event, as Mike points out, keen/aggressive vendors are going to do this regardless of what we think or say on this rather obscure corner of the Internet. Mark. _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
