On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 08:20:57AM -0800, Dave Crocker allegedly wrote: > I keep coming back to the very limited goal of DKIM and wondering whether the > concern about a downgrade attack isn't just a little too esoteric for that > goal.
It happens that it also solves the agility requirement too. So even if you're skeptical of downgrade attacks being relevant, we are hoping - I presume - that DKIM will live for longer than the current set of anointed algorithms and that we do need a way to transition that doesn't require a forklift. Mark. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://dkim.org/ietf-list-rules.html
