On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 08:14:52AM -0800, Michael Thomas allegedly wrote: > If you can't rank algorithms, is there any meaningful concept of a > "downgrade attack"?
Furthermore, if you can't rank one as better, why would we consider adding it to the repertoire in the first place? > I'm sort of wondering though if Mark's problem here might be just as > easily solved by having a "current"/"next" kind of routine. That is, Right. That simplifies/eliminates the skipping issue. > e2e), is there any real likelihood that a reasonable receiver will > be two versions behind? That's the question. Mark. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://dkim.org/ietf-list-rules.html
