>However, if I were to implement it, I would definitely mention the >issue of losing the [list name] prefix. I would put warnings in both >the user manual _and_ in a popup box that appears anytime the option >is enabled.
I suspect users would not consider this this to be an improved user experience. If you were to go down this road, which I do not recommend, I expect you'd end up with a database (shared or private) of lists and tags so you could skip the warning when the difference is the tag that the list is expected to insert. Ugh. As I've said before, I'd rather encourage list owners to sign their mail and use those signatures instead to whitelist lists from well-behaved sources. >Subject: <signed data> Warning, unsigned content - (old unsigned data) And the unsigned data includes [Dial 800-555-2368 for herbal [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bad guys are clever, and we must assume they will drive a truck through whatever opening we give them. This strikes me as one that is particularly ripe for abuse. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
