Dave, I disagree. We are defining how to verify a message. If we agree
that the mechanism below is a reasonable step to perform, it's still
just one more step in the verification process.
Tony Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave Crocker wrote:
> In particular:
>
>> The verifier then simply replaces the subject text with the value from
>> z= that was signed. That's one way of solving the mailing list
>> subject munging problem.
>
> This goes far beyond the specification. While it might be useful, it is
> really a heuristic and it is not part of the draft that is seeking
> standardization.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
