There are a number of ways that the EAI work may affect DKIM. Among them
is the use of the yet-to-be-determined downgrading algorithms.
Tony Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Thomas wrote:
> Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>
>> Even if it doesn't hit anywhere else, presumably the EAI work will
>> have to be taken into account for the z= field, with potential
>> changes being required to the current ABNF?
>
> I'm not sure about the ABNF, but why would it otherwise affect us?
> The z= is only a qp encoded blind copy of the bytes present. We don't
> define any semantics.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
