Mark Delany wrote:
> I agree that 'simple' is the easiest - in the original DomainKeys
> drafts there was a sample perl implementation that took 4 or 5 lines
> of code. Unfortunately because sendmail milter has a bug (that SMI
> have promised to fix) some of those who are bound by milter
> implementations want to bias the specification to match up with the
> limitation of milter.
>
> I expect that most of us have moved well beyond that sort of
> mono-culture mentality, and I know the SMI folk are *not* the ones
> pushing for this constraint, but nonetheless, it seems to live on in
> pockets.
Sendmail milter is not the only interface with this problem. There is at
least one other that has the same problems as milter; I think it was
qmail but would have to look it up for certain.
Tony Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
