> Mark Delany wrote:
> > I agree that 'simple' is the easiest - in the original DomainKeys
> > drafts there was a sample perl implementation that took 4 or 5 lines
> > of code. Unfortunately because sendmail milter has a bug (that SMI
> > have promised to fix) some of those who are bound by milter
> > implementations want to bias the specification to match up with the
> > limitation of milter.
> > I expect that most of us have moved well beyond that sort of
> > mono-culture mentality, and I know the SMI folk are *not* the ones
> > pushing for this constraint, but nonetheless, it seems to live on in
> > pockets.
> Sendmail milter is not the only interface with this problem. There is at
> least one other that has the same problems as milter; I think it was
> qmail but would have to look it up for certain.
And let's please not forget that even if this got fixed tomorrow the amount of
time it takes to significantly deploy new MTA versions is very long - far
longer than we can afford to wait.
Ned
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
