> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Delany
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 11:41:52PM -0400, Tony Hansen allegedly wrote: > > Minor nit: #5 doesn't apply because it's explicitly > required to use up > > to 40 bits. > > I'm actually a bit surprised that this is even talked about. > As a decimal representation, the relevance to 32bit unsigned > integers is a little tenuous. Never underestimate the ability of people to screw up. > In short, anyone who is still thinking 32bit in 2006 is > somewhat anti-diluvian. Whats wrong with being opposed to floods? Or are you saying we should favor global warming? I think you mean ante-diluvian. > Well, the days may be numbered for x= anyway, but if some > sort of timestamp is needed in the future, then maybe make it > millisecs or decisecs since 1970 and force the >32bit issue? Yep, or do minutes.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
