Jon Callas wrote: > The issue, then, is what happens when I have my expiration being > (e.g.) a month and I decide out of the blue to change keys. The answer > is that some messages now won't verify, which means they are > "suspicious" which interacts with SSP and other things to make it so > that some message might be flagged, filed, rejected or whatever in > ways that they would not have had I left the key there. Just to keep the use of the term focused, "suspicious" is a possible result of the SSP check. The way we have been using the term, a message would become suspicious if the signature that won't verify causes the SSP check to fail (e.g., the originating address's domain says it signs all messages).
I'm not trying to start an SSP discussion here -- merely trying to reserve the term "suspicious" for when we do. -Jim _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
