> To the extent that the working group might wish to specify normative > behavior, I suspect that Choice #1 should be a MUST NOT and probably > the same for #2.
I hope the spec doesn't get into putting requirements like that in place. It would be a burden on deploying DKIM in small operations that depend on others for DNS management.
-- Arvel _______________________________________________NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
