,---
| 2.1 Signers
|...
| The key issue is that a message must be signed before it
| leaves the administrative domain of the signer.
'---
What is intended by this statement? How does this relate to messages
signed by an MUA, which is not mentioned as a possible signer? Is
this statement intended to preclude the use of MUA signed messages?
(Use of the word "key" appears to be a poor choice of words.)
-Doug
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
