If a MUA is the signer I would hope it is within its own administrative domain. I haven't seen one yet that was outside of its own domain. Thanks,
Bill Oxley Messaging Engineer Cox Communications, Inc. Alpharetta GA 404-847-6397 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Otis Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 1:39 PM To: IETF-DKIM Subject: [ietf-dkim] 2.1 Signers // Within an administrative domain? ,--- | 2.1 Signers |... | The key issue is that a message must be signed before it | leaves the administrative domain of the signer. '--- What is intended by this statement? How does this relate to messages signed by an MUA, which is not mentioned as a possible signer? Is this statement intended to preclude the use of MUA signed messages? (Use of the word "key" appears to be a poor choice of words.) -Doug _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
