Eric Allman wrote:
>> Section 3.6.1, the ABNF for "s=" tag of key doesn't represent
>> "a colon-separated list" as described. So I think
>>
>> key-s-tag = %x73 [FWS] "=" [FWS] key-s-tag-type
>>
>> should be
>>
>> key-s-tag = %x73 [FWS] "=" [FWS] key-s-tag-type
>> 0*( [FWS] ":" [FWS] key-s-tag-type )
>
> True. Question for the list: should this actually be:
>
> key-s-tag = %x73 [FWS] "=" [FWS] ( "*" / key-s-tag-type-list )
>
> with key-s-tag-type-list defined as the colon separated list? Put
> another way, should "*" be a special qualifier, or just another type
> in the list?
Syntactically, "*" should be just another type in the list.
Tony Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
