v=0.2 v=1 and how about v=t for experimental? Bill Oxley Messaging Engineer Cox Communications, Inc. Alpharetta GA 404-847-6397 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Allman Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 2:02 PM To: IETF DKIM WG Subject: [ietf-dkim] Mandatory v= (summary from jabber session) As discussed in this morning's Jabber session, I have changed the "v=" tag in the DKIM-Signature header field from "MUST NOT" to "MUST", with an initial value of "0.2". We'll expect this to go to "1" when the spec is published. eric _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
