> As discussed in this morning's Jabber session, I have changed the "v=" > tag in the DKIM-Signature header field from "MUST NOT" to "MUST", with > an initial value of "0.2". We'll expect this to go to "1" when the > spec is published.
That sounds good to me. Sorry I missed the session. -- Arvel _______________________________________________NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
