I can live with this. But we might want to call the /foo something other
than an option.
Right now section 3.6.1 says:
q= ... where the syntax and semantics of the options depends on the
type.
Instead it would need to be:
q= ... where the syntax and semantics of the options depends on the
type and specified options.
Tony
Eric Allman wrote:
> Tony, as it turns out I had already edited in some changes --- I'll
> check to make sure they are consistent with what you propose.
>
> One change I made (tentatively) is to use the "options" part to indicate
> the record type --- so base defines "dns/txt" only, with a mention that
> we expect a "dns/dkk" type to appear later.
>
> All: any thoughts on whether this is a good idea?
>
> eric
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
