On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 11:55:51AM -0700, Michael Thomas allegedly wrote: > Mark Delany wrote: > > >>OLD: TXT records are encoded as described in Section 3.6.1. > >> > >> > > > >So I've circulated the draft DKK to a couple of people to get the > >roughest edges off. > > > >One of the big questions asked in that draft relates to the > >relationship between TXT and DKK semantics. Which one is authoritative > >and which one is a mirror? Or should base be authoritative and both > >the TXT and DKK simply be particular representations? > > > > > Is there really any reason to force one to be the master of the other?
Simply to avoid duplication of semantics. I was merely asking which text is the source of truth and where should it reside. Also, presumably if a DKK springs into existence, the TXT may well be frozen at some point with new functionality only going into the DKK RR. Mark. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
