On Thu, 18 May 2006, Tony Hansen wrote:
4) given that q= can take a list, the question of handling both RR
and TXT records could be denoted by using q=dnsrr,dns, rather
than saying that q=dnsrr should search both.
Please do. Though it would be good if authors listen to suggestions so
the same ones dont have to be brought up year later...
http://www.imc.org/ietf-mailsig/mail-archive/msg01279.html
--
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
