Dave Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What is the reason for Historic, rather than Informational? > > I am prety sure that historic has never been applied to a specification that > was > not previously an IETF standard. The usual means of labeling an RFC that > specifies a popular, proprietary protocol is Informational.
Maybe because the aim is that DKIM will obsolete DomainKeys with the hope that implementations currently experimenting with DomainKeys will 'upgrade' to using DKIM. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
