Dave Crocker wrote: > > I think your language describes things quite nicely. > > I am pretty sure that DKIM does not have anything that cares about 822 vs. > 2822. > That is, it works for both. > > So I have tended to view the dual-reference approach as a means of > communicating > to folks that they do not have to worry about old-vs-new specifications for > message syntax/semantics. > >
I agree but perhaps we need to be a bit more explicit about exactly what you say above, Dave. Eliot _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
