Paul Hoffman wrote: > At 12:17 PM -0700 7/27/06, Steve Atkins wrote: >> On Jul 27, 2006, at 12:08 PM, wayne wrote: >> >>> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Paul Hoffman >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> >>>> "I sign some mail" doesn't tell the recipient anything useful. >>>> >>>> What am I missing? >>> >>> It says that you should look at email without a signature as being >>> "acceptable", unlike a "I sign all mail" which without a signature is >>> quite questionable. >> >> How does that differ from a sender that doesn't have the >> "I sign some mail" flag set? > > Yes, exactly. Might the SSP record that says "I sign some mail", which could have a long TTL, be more effectively cached by DNS than the (negative) caching when there's no record?
-Jim _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
