>>So here's the main SSP axiom that I think should be self-evident, but >>apparently isn't: other than the trivial (but useful) case of I send no >>mail, the most that SSP can tell you is that a signature is missing.
>I take it then that you see distinguishing between first party and third >party signatures as either being of no value or not being feasible? I don't see the phrases "first party" or "third party" in there, either explictly or otherwise. R's, John PS: The SSP fog just keeps getting thicker. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
