I am not going to recommend whitelisting ANY domain unless I own it. Thanks,
Bill Oxley Messaging Engineer Cox Communications, Inc. Alpharetta GA 404-847-6397 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: John L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 10:15 PM To: Oxley, Bill (CCI-Atlanta) Cc: DKIM List Subject: RE: [ietf-dkim] A few SSP axioms > As long as we all remember that bad actors can get a domain, populate > dkim keys and ssp then send spam until they are noticed and shutdown. I hope we all understand that if SSP is useful at all, it's only about authentication, not reputation. > Policy will be by the receiver that a message that fails dkim/ssp is > flagged for a closer examination than a message that passes both dkim > and ssp but all mail will continue to be scrutinized. In the forseeable future, the main use of DKIM is likely to be more reliable whitelisting of people you already know you like. Regards, John Levine, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://johnlevine.com, Mayor "I dropped the toothpaste", said Tom, crestfallenly. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
