John L wrote: > I'm trying to think about what I'll do when DKIM is in wide use, I get > mail from thousands of sources that publish SSP info. If SSP says "I > sign everything" I have trouble figuring a use for it other than a flat > reject of unsigned messages or at least 4.9 points in a five point > scoring spam filter. I REALLY do not want an SSP that says "I sign > everything, and here is my estimate on a 0 to 10 scale of how much you > should care."
Right. SSP stands a much greater chance of being useful if it a) answers questions we believe the receivers will want to have answered, and b) the questions pertain to *simple* statements about signer/sender behaviors. Certainly this kind of minimal model is essential for initial adoption and use. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
