John L wrote: > It may sound like I'm channelling Dave here, but I don't want to put > anything into a protocol that doesn't have a straightforward operational > value, and I don't think that "stir it into the mix in spamassassin" is > straightforward.
It ain't me. It's a long-standing pattern of what gets deployed and used. So if there is any channeling, we are both doing it, on behalf of the God of Successful Protocols... d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
