On Wednesday 09 August 2006 20:32, Frank Ellermann wrote: > Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Can I suggest making concrete proposals, aimed at moving > > towards consensus > > It won't help if I reject three proposals "add 2822-Sender" > only because I don't understand it. It also won't help if > I'd support it, but have no clue why Resent-* are excluded. > Here is a concrete proposal....
In this round, we only specify sender policy for 2822.From. To the extent we have consensus that SSP is a good thing, we have consensus that it should cover 2822.From. Once you get beyond that, consensus is elusive at best. There is a requirement that the protocol be extensible. Later, if there is a demand, something else could be added. Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
