On Thursday 10 August 2006 11:00, Damon wrote: > Maybe #9 is an incomplete statement? > > The Protocol MUST NOT be required to be invoked if a valid first party > signature (without the 's') is found. However, if the first party > signature if damaged in transit the Protocol MUST be invoked to > determine if any authorized domain or third party signers have signed > the message. The order in which each authorized domain or third party > signer is validated MUST NOT be specified. > Since DKIM base already says damaged == no signature, I think this is not necessary.
Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
