----- Original Message ----- From: "Wietse Venema" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]>
> I prefer the "must not be required" form. I know that it implies > "may perform SSP lookup", but the latter form can more easily be > lobbied into a stronger recommendation for SSP lookup, which is > definitely not what I want. > I am curious to know, from an engineering standpoint, why it is something you definitely not want to see implemented? What am I missing here? While I prefer the latter because I believe it is better design, it really doesn't matter to me what it says or not since its an implementation issue. May the better implementation win. But if there is a fault in my proposal, I would seriously like to have the feedback if you may. If I'm wrong, Great! Just like to know what's wrong with doing SSP first as implied by requirements 2, 3, 4 and 7, but inconsistent with requirement 9? -- Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc. http://www.santronics.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
