2.8 I'm not sure suspicious is the right adjective here, perhaps non-conforming/conforming might be a better terminology. "I might be suspicious of a non-conforming signature." Thanks,
Bill Oxley Messaging Engineer Cox Communications, Inc. Alpharetta GA [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crocker Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 4:29 PM To: IETF-DKIM Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-allman-dkim-ssp-02.txt] TXT and HTML versions are also available at <http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-dkim.htm>. d/ Jim Fenton wrote: > FYI, an updated version of the Allman/Delany/Fenton SSP draft is now > available. The changes from -01 are fairly extensive; see the summary > of changes near the end of the document. > > -Jim > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > > > Title : DKIM Sender Signing Practices > Author(s) : E. Allman, et al. > Filename : draft-allman-dkim-ssp-02.txt > Pages : 18 > Date : 2006-8-31 > -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
