Stephen Farrell wrote: > As Doug said that predates the WG. The WG charter says "policy" (incl. the quotes) and mentions draft-allman-dkim-ssp
> once reqs-01 is out. we're planning to move back into > using the issue tracker, so you can of course raise this > as an issue if you like Yes. I fear the SSP adventure is over, PRA is bad, anything else is impossible. On the SPF lists folks tried for years to invent wild and wonderful new "identities" in addition to the Return-Path, and they all failed miserably, incompatible with 2822, only PRA makes remotely sense. This "first address of the From" can't work. Maybe you could get the RFC 2822 author as external expert about this idea, IIRC he was also invited to comment on some MARID proposals. Frank _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
